Why spend money on IP?
The subject of the report is the influence of intellectual property rights (IPR) on the economic performance of companies in the EU.
The main findings of the study are: Companies that own IPR achieve on average 23.8% higher sales per employee compared to companies without IPR. After accounting for factors such as industry, company size and location, this advantage increases to 41%. Employees in companies with IPR receive on average 22% higher wages than their colleagues in companies without IPR. Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) benefit particularly from IPR. Although only about 10% of EU SMEs own registered IPR, they report a 44% higher turnover per employee compared to SMEs without IPR. Companies that combine several types of IPR, such as trademarks and designs, see the highest increases in turnover per employee.
Consequently, there is a clear positive correlation between the ownership of IPR and the economic performance of companies in the EU. And a considerable potential for SMEs in particular to increase their competitiveness and profitability by acquiring and using IPR.The results underline the need to raise awareness of the benefits of IPR.
You might also be interested in this
The EUIPO saw no problem with OBELIX on goods such as firearms and explosives. Les Éditions Albert René did. In its judgment of 13 May 2026 in Case T-24/25, the General Court sided with the publisher — finding EUIPO's assessment of both reputation and the required link between the marks to be fundamentally flawed.
Symbols such as “®” and indications such as “patented” are widely recognised. They are encountered almost daily, for example on product packaging in shops. Known more precisely as “IP notices”, such symbols have become a standard feature of commercial practice in Germany. However, they are often misunderstood.
Following legal disputes relating to the origin of chocolate bars another feature of chocolate bars is causing a stir these days: their shape.
We summarize the Bamberg Regional Court’s decision dated March 11, 2026 (case no. 1 HK O 19/25) for you and explain its implications for platform operators and influencers.
