Why spend money on IP?
The subject of the report is the influence of intellectual property rights (IPR) on the economic performance of companies in the EU.
The main findings of the study are: Companies that own IPR achieve on average 23.8% higher sales per employee compared to companies without IPR. After accounting for factors such as industry, company size and location, this advantage increases to 41%. Employees in companies with IPR receive on average 22% higher wages than their colleagues in companies without IPR. Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) benefit particularly from IPR. Although only about 10% of EU SMEs own registered IPR, they report a 44% higher turnover per employee compared to SMEs without IPR. Companies that combine several types of IPR, such as trademarks and designs, see the highest increases in turnover per employee.
Consequently, there is a clear positive correlation between the ownership of IPR and the economic performance of companies in the EU. And a considerable potential for SMEs in particular to increase their competitiveness and profitability by acquiring and using IPR.The results underline the need to raise awareness of the benefits of IPR.
You might also be interested in this
From 2 August 2026, the labelling obligation under Article 50(4) of the EU AI Act applies – and it reaches practically anyone who uses generative AI professionally to create images, videos, or text. On 10 June 2026, the European Commission published the final Code of Practice on the labelling of AI-generated content. We explain when a label is required, what it must look like, and what risks arise if it is missing.
OLG Bamberg, final judgment of 18 March 2026, case no. 3 UKl 5/25 e | For the first time, a Higher Regional Court has held that the obligations relating to recommender systems and reporting procedures under the Digital Services Act are consumer-protective and can be enforced by consumer associations by way of an action for injunctive relief. In doing so, the Senate gives contour to indeterminate legal concepts governing the design of the de-personalisation option and of the formal notice-and-action procedure. We summarise the decision and provide guidance for practice.
The EUIPO saw no problem with OBELIX on goods such as firearms and explosives. Les Éditions Albert René did. In its judgment of 13 May 2026 in Case T-24/25, the General Court sided with the publisher — finding EUIPO's assessment of both reputation and the required link between the marks to be fundamentally flawed.
Symbols such as “®” and indications such as “patented” are widely recognised. They are encountered almost daily, for example on product packaging in shops. Known more precisely as “IP notices”, such symbols have become a standard feature of commercial practice in Germany. However, they are often misunderstood.
