GIs for craft and industrial products
General
More than half of the Member States have created specific sui generis national protection systems for craft and industrial products (‘CI products’) with different characteristics The others only use trade marks and/or unfair competition rules to protect their intangible goods. Also, there was no cross-border system of mutual recognition of national protection systems in the internal market. At Union level, manufacturers could register individual trade marks, collective marks and certification marks. However, the use of trade mark protection did not allow producers of CI products to certify at Union level the link between quality and geographical origin, which signals qualities that are due to specific local skills and traditions.
This is now changing due to the Regulation (EU) 2023/2411 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 October 2023 on the protection of geographical indications for craft and industrial products and amending Regulations (EU) 2017/1001 and (EU) 2019/1753, which entered into force on 16 November 2023. The launch of the new application system is foreseen for December 2025, with the EUIPO being in charge of setting it up.
Content
To gain EU-wide protection against infringements, products shall meet the following criteria:
- The product must originate in a specific place, region or country;
- Its given quality, reputation or other characteristic must be essentially attributable to its geographical origin; and
- At least one of its production steps must take place in the defined geographical area.
Examination and registration will be done in two phases: Applicants will first file their GI applications to designated Member States' authorities, who will then submit successful applications for further evaluation and approval to the EUIPO. A direct application procedure to EUIPO will also be possible for Member States that obtain a derogation from the Commission, if they have no national evaluation procedure in place or lack interested producers.
Craft and industrial producers will have the opportunity to showcase their protected GI by displaying a distinct logo on their products. This labelling will enable consumers to identify craft and industrial products with specific characteristics linked to their geographical origin, helping them make informed choices when purchasing these products. Producers will have the ability to seek international protection via WIPO for their products' names, enhancing their global competitiveness. Third country producers will also be able to seek protection under this new EU scheme for their well-known craft and industrial products that comply with the EU requirements.
Relationship with national rights and deadlines
By 2 December 2026, national specific protection for GIs for craft and industrial products shall cease to exist, and pending applications shall be considered not to have been submitted, unless a request for registration and protection is made by interested Member States.
Searchability
The EUIPO is tasked with establishing and maintaining the Union register for GIs. GIs applied for and entered in the Union registers will searchable via the GIview portal.
Key points for the business
It may be worthwhile going through the product portfolio to check:
- whether there are any national protections for GIs that need to be converted to EU-wide rights;
- whether any of such products marketed by a company are worth protecting by way of GI;
- the other way around moving forward: Prior to launching products, in order to avoid infringements, it is worthwhile checking whether any names or descriptions (or names and descriptions similar to such) contemplated for the product are protected as GI.
We can help
Just let us know whether you have any questions or wish us to elaborate any issues in more detail.
You might also be interested in this
The European Union has implemented significant reforms to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). The changes, which took effect on September 1, 2024, are designed to improve the efficiency of the court system and increase transparency in its operations.
The law of jurisdiction contains a number of pitfalls which are often underestimated in practice, particularly at the interface between contractual and tort claims. In this article, we discuss a recent decision of the Oberlandesgericht Karlsruhe (Karlsruhe Higher Regional Court), which had to rule on a claim brought by a journalist who had unsuccessfully challenged the blocking of his account on an internet platform on the grounds of a breach of the law on unfair competition (OLG Karlsruhe, Urt. v. 8.Mai 2024,Az.6U198/23).
So-called repeat filings, often intended to circumvent the obligation to put the trademark to genuine use and thus taking advantage of further grace periods for the refiled trademarks, might seem attractive in particular to reduce costs. However, they also involve the risk of finding bad faith at least under EU law. The concept of bad faith is not legally defined but is shaped by the respective case-law. In this respect, the “Monopoly” Judgment of the General Court sets forth relevant principles and provides important strategic guidelines. Furthermore, the recent decisions of the Cancellation Division of the EUIPO regarding the trademarks of the famous artist Banksy representing one of his best known artworks, the Flower Thrower, demonstrate the importance of having a sound strategy behind any trademark filing. In the following, we will have a closer look at these cases to illustrate the possible risks of repeat filings and to provide some advice on risk-minimizing trademark filing strategies.
The Federal Court of Justice (BGH) has ruled on a lawsuit over an advertisement from the German confectionery company Katjes. This involved competition law issues relating to the use of the climate neutrality statement of the production of Katje's products.
