Act against Digital Violence
The purpose of the law is to enable victims of rights violations in the digital space to enforce their rights more effectively. The key points of the draft are:
Right to information: Data subjects whose personal rights have been violated by certain criminal content shall have easier access to information about the identity of the users acting unlawfully. Online platforms and hosting services are obliged to provide this information.
Storage and blocking: An early court order for the storage of relevant data by service providers is intended to prevent such data from being deleted before the proceedings are concluded. In addition, a new instrument is introduced that allows for the blocking of user accounts by court order to prevent or stop serious infringements.
Authorized recipients: Social networks that are not based in an EU member state must continue to appoint a domestic authorized recipient. Providers from other EU member states may be required to appoint an authorized recipient for legal proceedings in individual cases.
Scope of criminal offenses: The law against digital violence covers, among other things, punishable hate speech, deep fakes and doxing. This broadening of the scope of criminal offenses is intended to ensure that a wide range of forms of digital violence are covered and prosecuted.
Proportionality: Court-ordered measures, such as account suspensions, must be proportionate and will only be ordered for a reasonable period of time.
Final remark: The law aims to strengthen victims' rights by providing more effective legal tools and options, without fundamentally questioning the fundamental principles of freedom of expression and anonymity on the internet. It remains to be seen how the draft will be handled after the federal elections.
You might also be interested in this
Following legal disputes relating to the origin of chocolate bars another feature of chocolate bars is causing a stir these days: their shape.
We summarize the Bamberg Regional Court’s decision dated March 11, 2026 (case no. 1 HK O 19/25) for you and explain its implications for platform operators and influencers.
The copyright status of the world-famous Diary of Anne Frank has been the subject of international controversy for many years. Differing regulations on neighboring rights within the EU have sparked a territorial conflict over copyright protection in the digital age, which is now even being addressed by the European Court of Justice.
A trademark is one of a company’s most valuable assets. It stands for quality, recognizability, and trust among customers. In addition, a trademark enables a clear differentiation from the competition and strengthens the brand presence in the long term. These and many other advantages speak in favor of protecting a sign as a trademark at an early stage.
