A look behind the scenes of the HARTE-BAVENDAMM Academy
The four cornerstones of the HB Academy
Our workshops and training sessions at the HARTE-BAVENDAMM Academy are organised into four thematic blocks and generally take place every fortnight. In addition to regular case law updates, sessions on new legislation and training on current topics, our continuous learning program also offers workshops on training in negotiations, improving presentation skills, as well as resilience and communication training.
Participation in the HB Academy is open not only to our associates, but also to all of those who are completing their legal clerkship or internship with us or who work for us as research assistants.
The HARTE-BAVENDAMM Academy covers a wide range of topics:
- 𝗛𝗕 𝗟𝗲𝗴𝗮𝗹 – Exploring the latest case law, key focus topics and legislative plans in the field of intellectual property and unfair competition law.
- 𝗛𝗮𝗿𝘁𝗲-𝗕𝗔𝗩𝗘𝗡𝗗𝗔𝗠𝗠 𝗦𝗸𝗶𝗹𝗹𝘀 – Enhancing language, negotiation, and presentation abilities.
- 𝗦𝗼𝗳𝘁𝗲-𝗕𝗔𝗩𝗘𝗡𝗗𝗔𝗠𝗠 𝗦𝗸𝗶𝗹𝗹𝘀 – Focusing on the well-being of our team, soft skills and effective communication
- 𝗛𝗕 𝗙𝘂𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲 – Exploring cutting-edge topics like blockchain, AI, and legal tech.
Especially, the last two pillars of the “HARTE-BAVENDAMM Academy” are particularly dear to our heart. Soft skills help our team master the demands of a legal career while maintaining a healthy work-life balance. We also believe that they are a cornerstone for building strong and lasting client relationships. This is because soft skills complement our legal expertise and allow us to provide our clients with a client-centered approach on a personal level that goes beyond simply understanding the law. In addition, we firmly believe that our continuous adaptation to new technologies is essential for staying competitive in a technology-driven legal landscape.
Workshop on "Appearance and Body language" with Carmen Schön
We generally prepare the content of the HARTE-BAVENDAMM Academy ourselves. After all, we already inhabit a great deal of expert knowledge within the firm that we want to share. However, for certain topics, we deliberately bring in external coaches and trainers.
Last week, Carmen Schön was our guest and organised a half-day workshop on the topic of "Appearance and Body language" in our offices. As a lawyer herself and former head of a legal department, Carmen knows first-hand the criteria for how law firms win pitches and what inspires clients. Thanks to her professional training as a TV presenter, she was able to show us impressively how people are most convincing in conversation with their rhetoric, body language and voice. We appreciated to receive many valuable tips and suggestions from her.
The importance of body language (in Carmen's own words: "60 % body language, 30 % voice, 10 % content") and the signals that we often unconsciously send towards other people in the room became really clear to us all when Carmen, with her natural wit and charm, gave us some visual demonstration of various types of gesticulations such as "the gun" or "the hedgehog".
After a good two hours of theory followed by an exchange of our own experiences, we were asked to put what we had just learnt into practice: Each participant had to give an impromptu pitch of around 2-3 minutes in front of the camera and the others afterwards gave feedback.
The workshop with Carmen was great fun for all of us, very instructive and definitely brought us closer together as a team. Thank you, Carmen, for these inspiring hours!
You might also be interested in this
The European Union has implemented significant reforms to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). The changes, which took effect on September 1, 2024, are designed to improve the efficiency of the court system and increase transparency in its operations.
The law of jurisdiction contains a number of pitfalls which are often underestimated in practice, particularly at the interface between contractual and tort claims. In this article, we discuss a recent decision of the Oberlandesgericht Karlsruhe (Karlsruhe Higher Regional Court), which had to rule on a claim brought by a journalist who had unsuccessfully challenged the blocking of his account on an internet platform on the grounds of a breach of the law on unfair competition (OLG Karlsruhe, Urt. v. 8.Mai 2024,Az.6U198/23).
So-called repeat filings, often intended to circumvent the obligation to put the trademark to genuine use and thus taking advantage of further grace periods for the refiled trademarks, might seem attractive in particular to reduce costs. However, they also involve the risk of finding bad faith at least under EU law. The concept of bad faith is not legally defined but is shaped by the respective case-law. In this respect, the “Monopoly” Judgment of the General Court sets forth relevant principles and provides important strategic guidelines. Furthermore, the recent decisions of the Cancellation Division of the EUIPO regarding the trademarks of the famous artist Banksy representing one of his best known artworks, the Flower Thrower, demonstrate the importance of having a sound strategy behind any trademark filing. In the following, we will have a closer look at these cases to illustrate the possible risks of repeat filings and to provide some advice on risk-minimizing trademark filing strategies.
The Federal Court of Justice (BGH) has ruled on a lawsuit over an advertisement from the German confectionery company Katjes. This involved competition law issues relating to the use of the climate neutrality statement of the production of Katje's products.
