A look behind the scenes of the HARTE-BAVENDAMM Academy
The four cornerstones of the HB Academy
Our workshops and training sessions at the HARTE-BAVENDAMM Academy are organised into four thematic blocks and generally take place every fortnight. In addition to regular case law updates, sessions on new legislation and training on current topics, our continuous learning program also offers workshops on training in negotiations, improving presentation skills, as well as resilience and communication training.
Participation in the HB Academy is open not only to our associates, but also to all of those who are completing their legal clerkship or internship with us or who work for us as research assistants.
The HARTE-BAVENDAMM Academy covers a wide range of topics:
- 𝗛𝗕 𝗟𝗲𝗴𝗮𝗹 – Exploring the latest case law, key focus topics and legislative plans in the field of intellectual property and unfair competition law.
- 𝗛𝗮𝗿𝘁𝗲-𝗕𝗔𝗩𝗘𝗡𝗗𝗔𝗠𝗠 𝗦𝗸𝗶𝗹𝗹𝘀 – Enhancing language, negotiation, and presentation abilities.
- 𝗦𝗼𝗳𝘁𝗲-𝗕𝗔𝗩𝗘𝗡𝗗𝗔𝗠𝗠 𝗦𝗸𝗶𝗹𝗹𝘀 – Focusing on the well-being of our team, soft skills and effective communication
- 𝗛𝗕 𝗙𝘂𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲 – Exploring cutting-edge topics like blockchain, AI, and legal tech.
Especially, the last two pillars of the “HARTE-BAVENDAMM Academy” are particularly dear to our heart. Soft skills help our team master the demands of a legal career while maintaining a healthy work-life balance. We also believe that they are a cornerstone for building strong and lasting client relationships. This is because soft skills complement our legal expertise and allow us to provide our clients with a client-centered approach on a personal level that goes beyond simply understanding the law. In addition, we firmly believe that our continuous adaptation to new technologies is essential for staying competitive in a technology-driven legal landscape.
Workshop on "Appearance and Body language" with Carmen Schön
We generally prepare the content of the HARTE-BAVENDAMM Academy ourselves. After all, we already inhabit a great deal of expert knowledge within the firm that we want to share. However, for certain topics, we deliberately bring in external coaches and trainers.
Last week, Carmen Schön was our guest and organised a half-day workshop on the topic of "Appearance and Body language" in our offices. As a lawyer herself and former head of a legal department, Carmen knows first-hand the criteria for how law firms win pitches and what inspires clients. Thanks to her professional training as a TV presenter, she was able to show us impressively how people are most convincing in conversation with their rhetoric, body language and voice. We appreciated to receive many valuable tips and suggestions from her.
The importance of body language (in Carmen's own words: "60 % body language, 30 % voice, 10 % content") and the signals that we often unconsciously send towards other people in the room became really clear to us all when Carmen, with her natural wit and charm, gave us some visual demonstration of various types of gesticulations such as "the gun" or "the hedgehog".
After a good two hours of theory followed by an exchange of our own experiences, we were asked to put what we had just learnt into practice: Each participant had to give an impromptu pitch of around 2-3 minutes in front of the camera and the others afterwards gave feedback.
The workshop with Carmen was great fun for all of us, very instructive and definitely brought us closer together as a team. Thank you, Carmen, for these inspiring hours!
You might also be interested in this
In its judgment of 9 July 2026 (C-788/24), the ECJ followed the Opinion of Advocate General Rantos in the legal dispute concerning the online publication of “The Diary of Anne Frank”. At its core, the case centred on the question of whether geoblocking measures constitute effective technological protection measures against copyright infringements, even if they can be circumvented by VPN services. The Court has now answered this question with a clear ‘yes’.
The judgment ‘Obligation to Return VI’ (I ZR 123/25) of 3 June 2026 is – as the name suggests – the sixth judgment by the First Civil Senate of the Federal Court of Justice (BGH) on the so-called obligation to return applicable to hire cars. Following the pronouncement of the judgement, it was widely reported that the BGH had confirmed the continued validity of one of the most controversial provisions of passenger transport law. In the meantime, the dust has settled somewhat and it is becoming clear that this interpretation falls far short of the mark. Indeed, it follows from the grounds of the judgement that maintaining the obligation to return contravenes EU law if one takes its traditional objective and justification as a basis.
In November 2025, the EUIPO Boards of Appeal published a case-law research report on the “Thomson Life doctrine” and the concept of an element’s “independent distinctive role” in composite trade marks. The report is not binding, but it is a useful attempt to bring order to an area of trade mark comparison that even the EU Courts have applied inconsistently.
From 2 August 2026, the labelling obligation under Article 50(4) of the EU AI Act applies – and it reaches practically anyone who uses generative AI professionally to create images, videos, or text. On 10 June 2026, the European Commission published the final Code of Practice on the labelling of AI-generated content. We explain when a label is required, what it must look like, and what risks arise if it is missing.
